home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.uidaho.edu!usenet
- From: dickow@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu (dickow)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Best wordprocessor?
- Date: 18 Jan 1996 04:27:11 GMT
- Organization: University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <891.6590T992T2430@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu>
- References: <961.6589T1295T2396@uni-muenster.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: xslip51.csrv.uidaho.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- >Hi everybody out there!
-
- >I know I'll regret this question, but I'd really like to know what the users
- >of either Wordworth or FinalWriter think why 'their' program is the best
- >wordprocessor available. Of course, I'm also glad if someone makes a
-
- I plan to stick with FinalWriter, even though it may seen to lack a couple
- of features that WW has. I like FW's interface and general feel, and find it
- to be very stable and bug free. I'm sure it has bugs somewhere, but I have
- never found one in years of heavy use. Despite a few minor gripes, I like the
- continuing development and support for this product. The Rexx interfacing is
- handy, too. Output is very good. I use it often for light DP postscript
- output, and results are always fine, and predictable too.
-
- **************************************//*
- * Bob Dickow (dickow@uidaho.edu) \\// *
- *****************************************
-
-